BRITAIN'S CONTROVERSIAL AUTHORITY FOR MILITARY STRIKE AGAINST SYRIA WITH, OR WITHOUT THE UN PERMANENT SECURITY MEMBERS SUPPORT CONTRADICTS THE UN MANDATE FOR PEACE IN SYRIA.

BRITAIN'S CONTROVERSIAL AUTHORITY FOR MILITARY STRIKE AGAINST SYRIA WITH, OR WITHOUT THE UN PERMANENT SECURITY COUNCIL MEMBERS SUPPORT CONTRADICTS THE UN MANDATE FOR PEACE IN SYRIA.

      Debates for military strike against Syria with, or without the UN permanent Security Council Members support continued in extra-ordinary meetings and in Parliamentary debates in many countries around the World, particularly in the USA, Russia, the European Union countries, the Middle Eastern, the Arab World and African countries. Many countries have rejected, but some countries have approved Britain's controversial authority for strike against Syria which certainly contradicts the UN mandate for peace in Syria and for the prevention of use of chemical weapons in the current civil warfare in Syria. UN Investigators in Syria have been requested to evacuate Ghouta and leave Syria as early as on Saturday, September 01 in the year 2013. Journalists and media personnel at home and in foreign countries have to begun to leave their homes for Syria with the hope for detail coverages of Britain's and the Allied forces initial strikes against Syria.

                                    Written by Professor Godfrey Ohia.