EUROPEAN UNION HIGHEST COURT CONCLUDED ITS REQUIRED FINAL DECISION ON THE CONTROVERSIAL POLICY THAT THREATENS EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES UNITY.

   European Union Highest Court concluded its required final decision on one of the controversial political financial economic immigration social security and defense issues that threatens the unity of European Union countries earlier in the week by the ruling that supported European Union government current policies, particularly the policy for the solution to the current immigration crisis in Western Europe with the European Union countries unified policy for distribution of refugees and asylum seekers in Western and few Eastern European countries, but the European Union government rejected Eastern European countries demand for cash money allocation to few Eastern European countries for the cost of hosting refugees, or for compensation of the funds used by Eastern European countries to build barbed wired fence along the Western and Eastern European countries border region for the prevention of refugees and asylum seekers influx from Eastern European countries to Western European countries cities, particularly in the major cities of Germany Switzerland Austria Denmark Sweden Britain and France. The European Union Highest Court further emphasized on the results of the Highest Court revision and ruling on the controversial policy which neither revealed violation of Constitutional Rights, nor the legislative, or civil rights with the values of domestic European Union countries citizens within the specified time period, or since immigration crisis broke out in Western Europe with the demand for the sought of immediate solution to the refugees and asylum seekers influx in Western Europe that entailed the erection of the fence along the border region between Western and Eastern European countries. Besides, the demand for further and faster deportation of rejected refugees and asylum seekers from various countries of this World, particularly those from Eastern Europe Afghanistan Syria the Northern African countries of Tunisia Algeria Morocco and other North West East and South African countries, despite the United Nations Organization repeated complain against indiscriminate deportation of rejected refugees and asylum seekers from Western Europe, particularly those that have been rescued by the joined European Union and Eurozone countries Naval Forces that have been deployed for the rescue operation of refugees asylum seekers and illegal immigrants in the Mediterranean Sea and along European Union countries coastal region. European Union Highest Court final decision and ruling on the controversial distribution policy of European Union countries may not have found and did not mentioned any violation of refugees asylum seekers and illegal immigrants rights by the domestic Eurozone's regional courts that have been responsible for refugees and asylum seekers cases with the decisions that have been made recognition rejection and deportation of refugees and asylum seekers that have not been eligible for refugee, or asylum seeker status in Western Europe, or those that may have failed to fulfill the basic requirements demanded of every refugee or asylum seeker currently residing in Western Europe which entailed going to school and acquiring sufficient knowledge and skill that may enable a refugee, or asylum seeker to contribute in the jobs and markets economy by their skill or constant hard labor for those in the job business that requires mental health or physical strength which may enable self sufficiency and independency being sought by refugees, or asylum seekers and their families. Besides, the requirement for proficiency in the various European Union countries languages that will enable adequate communication for social interaction and eventual integration in to European Union countries various Communities and Societies. Other controversial policies that may be ruled upon, or may require the European Union Highest Court final decision entailed the EU financial issues, specially with Britain, due to Brexit . Security and the war against terrorism in Europe's major cities and the controversial defense policy for formation of European Union High Command Center Headquarters in Germany France Belgium and in the none Brexit, or the none exiting United Kingdom countries from EU membership have additional major issues that requires solution by the decision of EU Highest Court in Brussels.

       Written by Professor Godfrey Ohia
Bank : Green Dot Bank, Routing Number : 124303120
Account Number : 301582402494
Account Type : Checking
Name : Professor Godfrey Ohia
Direct Deposit Account, Routing Number : 1243031
Account Number : 19958593088299321.