LENGHTY PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE OF EU LEADERS HELD AT THE EUROPEAN UNION PARLIAMENT IN BRUSSELS RESULTED IN POSITIVE CONCLUSIONS THAT MAY BE REFERRED TO AS SOLUTIONS.

    Positive conclusions made at the European Union Parliament extended debate on refugee and asylum policy over the weekend has been generally referred to as positive conclusions, rather than solutions to the current controversial refugee and asylum policy that has caused division among EU major political parties and EU major countries as Britain France Sweden Denmark Norway Italy and Germany, particularly over the deportation of refugees and asylum seekers with multiple protection status from Germany to the nearest EU neighboring country borders, specially to the borders of the countries in which the refugee, or asylum seekers may have been first recognized and given protection status by the first country of refuge, besides the deportation of voluntary refugees, or asylum seekers and those who had been rejected, or denied protection status by federal government of the various Stages of Germany to their original home countries as demanded, or obligated by the refugee, or asylum seekers and the federal government of the Democratic Republic of Germany. Establishment of temporary and permanent refugee and asylum centers within the Eurozone and in the countries of conflicts, if the lives of the refugees and asylum seekers have been proven as in less threatening conditions in their original home of conflict. Refusal of few EU countries to welcome and rehabilitate new arrivals that may be refugees asylum seekers, or illegal immigrants to their shores and ports has been a turning factor in the Eurozone countries refugee asylum and immigration policy that has caused division among the major political parties and Eurozone countries that have reflected to the domestic countries Humanitarian and hospitality records with regards to the Eurozone countries sensible records about treatment of fellow mankind at their difficult time in either the domestic, or the mentioned foreign countries. Allocation of financial assistance in Eu financial assistance packages by both the domestic and EU government has been equally significant to the secondary goals for none violation of immigration laws by refugees and asylum seekers in few domestic Eurozone countries in which they have been privileged by rehabilitation and recognition status as either refugee asylum seeker, or legal immigrant.

          Written by Professor Godfrey Ohia.

Bank : paypal.me/OHIAGODFREY
E-mail : ohiaprofessorgodfrey92@gmail.com
Telephone : +1 678-437-0587
Name : Professor Godfrey Ohia.